When we get a PER i-fetch event on an EXECUTE or EXECUTE RELATIVE LONG
instruction, because the executed instruction generated a PER i-fetch
event, then the PER address points at the EXECUTE function, not the
fetched one.
Therefore, when filtering PER events, we have to take care of the
really fetched instruction, which we can only get by reading in guest
virtual memory.
For icpt code 4 and 56, we directly have additional information about an
EXECUTE instruction at hand. For icpt code 8, we always have to read
in guest virtual memory.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[small fixes]
We already filter PER events reported via icpt code 8. For icpt code
4 and 56, this is still missing.
So let's properly detect if we have a debugging event and if we have to
inject a PER i-fetch event into the guest at all.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
If the SCA entries aren't used by the hardware (no SIGPIF), we
can simply not set the entries, stick to the basic sca and allow more
than 64 VCPUs.
To hinder any other facility from using these entries, let's properly
provoke intercepts by not setting the MCN and keeping the entries
unset.
This effectively allows when running KVM under KVM (vSIE) or under z/VM to
provide more than 64 VCPUs to a guest. Let's limit it to 255 for now, to
not run into problems if the CPU numbers are limited somewhere else.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's avoid working with the PER_EVENT* defines, used for control register
manipulation, when checking the u8 PER code. Introduce separate defines
based on the existing defines.
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Vector registers are only to be stored if the facility is available
and if the guest has set up the machine check extended save area.
If anything goes wrong while writing the vector registers, the vector
registers are to be marked as invalid. Please note that we are allowed
to write the registers although they are marked as invalid.
Machine checks and "store status" SIGP orders are two different concepts,
let's correctly separate these. As the SIGP part is completely handled in
user space, we can drop it.
This patch is based on a patch from Cornelia Huck.
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Store status writes the prefix which is not to be done by a machine check.
Also, the psw is stored and later on overwritten by the failing-storage
address, which looks strange at first sight.
Store status and machine check handling look similar, but they are actually
two different things.
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's factor this out to prepare for bigger changes. Reorder to calls to
match the logical order given in the PoP.
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We store the address of riccbd at the wrong location, overwriting
gvrd. This means that our nested guest will not be able to use runtime
instrumentation. Also, a memory leak, if our KVM guest actually sets gvrd.
Not noticed until now, as KVM guests never make use of gvrd and runtime
instrumentation wasn't completely tested yet.
Reported-by: Fan Zhang <zhangfan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
The increment might not be atomic and we're not holding the
timekeeper_lock. Therefore we might lose an update to count, resulting in
VDSO being trapped in a loop. As other archs also simply update the
values and count doesn't seem to have an impact on reloading of these
values in VDSO code, let's just remove the update of tb_update_count.
Suggested-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
By leaving fixup_cc unset, only the clock comparator of the cpu actually
doing the sync is fixed up until now.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
There are still some etr leftovers and wrong comments, let's clean that up.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The way we call do_adjtimex() today is broken. It has 0 effect, as
ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT (0x0001) in the kernel maps to !ADJ_ADJTIME
(in contrast to user space where it maps to ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT |
ADJ_ADJTIME - 0x8001). !ADJ_ADJTIME will silently ignore all adjustments
without STA_PLL being active. We could switch to ADJ_ADJTIME or turn
STA_PLL on, but still we would run into some problems:
- Even when switching to nanoseconds, we lose accuracy.
- Successive calls to do_adjtimex() will simply overwrite any leftovers
from the previous call (if not fully handled)
- Anything that NTP does using the sysctl heavily interferes with our
use.
- !ADJ_ADJTIME will silently round stuff > or < than 0.5 seconds
Reusing do_adjtimex() here just feels wrong. The whole STP synchronization
works right now *somehow* only, as do_adjtimex() does nothing and our
TOD clock jumps in time, although it shouldn't. This is especially bad
as the clock could jump backwards in time. We will have to find another
way to fix this up.
As leap seconds are also not properly handled yet, let's just get rid of
all this complex logic altogether and use the correct clock_delta for
fixing up the clock comparator and keeping the sched_clock monotonic.
This change should have 0 effect on the current STP mechanism. Once we
know how to best handle sync events and leap second updates, we'll start
with a fresh implementation.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
As the meaning of these variables and pointers seems to change more
frequently, let's directly access our save area, instead of going via
current->thread.
Right now, this is broken for set/get_fpu. They simply overwrite the
host registers, as the pointers to the current save area were turned
into the static host save area.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7
Fixes: 3f6813b9a5 ("s390/fpu: allocate 'struct fpu' with the task_struct")
Reported-by: Hao QingFeng <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We don't emulate ptff subfunctions, therefore react on any attempt of
execution by setting cc=3 (Requested function not available).
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We will use illegal instruction 0x0000 for handling 2 byte sw breakpoints
from user space. As it can be enabled dynamically via a capability,
let's move setting of ICTL_OPEREXC to the post creation step, so we avoid
any races when enabling that capability just while adding new cpus.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
__tlb_flush_asce() should never be used if multiple asce belong to a mm.
As this function changes mm logic determining if local or global tlb
flushes will be neded, we might end up flushing only the gmap asce on all
CPUs and a follow up mm asce flushes will only flush on the local CPU,
although that asce ran on multiple CPUs.
The missing tlb flushes will provoke strange faults in user space and even
low address protections in user space, crashing the kernel.
Fixes: 1b948d6cae ("s390/mm,tlb: optimize TLB flushing for zEC12")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15+
Reported-by: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
In case we have to emuluate an instruction or part of it (instruction,
partial instruction, operation exception), we have to inject a PER
instruction-fetching event for that instruction, if hardware told us to do
so.
In case we retry an instruction, we must not inject the PER event.
Please note that we don't filter the events properly yet, so guest
debugging will be visible for the guest.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's be careful first and allow nested virtualization only if enabled
by the system administrator. In addition, user space still has to
explicitly enable it via SCLP features for it to work.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We have certain SIE features that we cannot support for now.
Let's add these features, so user space can directly prepare to enable
them, so we don't have to update yet another component.
In addition, add a comment block, telling why it is for now not possible to
forward/enable these features.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Guest 2 sets up the epoch of guest 3 from his point of view. Therefore,
we have to add the guest 2 epoch to the guest 3 epoch. We also have to take
care of guest 2 epoch changes on STP syncs. This will work just fine by
also updating the guest 3 epoch when a vsie_block has been set for a VCPU.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Whenever a SIGP external call is injected via the SIGP external call
interpretation facility, the VCPU is not kicked. When a VCPU is currently
in the VSIE, the external call might not be processed immediately.
Therefore we have to provoke partial execution exceptions, which leads to a
kick of the VCPU and therefore also kick out of VSIE. This is done by
simulating the WAIT state. This bit has no other side effects.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As we want to make use of CPUSTAT_WAIT also when a VCPU is not idle but
to force interception of external calls, let's check in the bitmap instead.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Whenever we want to wake up a VCPU (e.g. when injecting an IRQ), we
have to kick it out of vsie, so the request will be handled faster.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We can avoid one unneeded SIE entry after we reported a fault to g2.
Theoretically, g2 resolves the fault and we can create the shadow mapping
directly, instead of failing again when entering the SIE.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We can easily forward guest-storage-limit-suppression if available.
One thing to care about is keeping the prefix properly mapped when
gsls in toggled on/off or the mso changes in between. Therefore we better
remap the prefix on any mso changes just like we already do with the
prefix.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As we forward the whole SCA provided by guest 2, we can directly forward
SIIF if available.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's provide the 64-bit-SCAO facility to guest 2, so he can set up a SCA
for guest 3 that has a 64 bit address. Please note that we already require
the 64 bit SCAO for our vsie implementation, in order to forward the SCA
directly (by pinning the page).
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As soon as guest 2 is allowed to use run-time-instrumentation (indicated
via via STFLE), it can also enable it for guest 3.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As soon as guest 2 is allowed to use the vector facility (indicated via
STFLE), it can also enable it for guest 3. We have to take care of the
sattellite block that might be used when not relying on lazy vector
copying (not the case for KVM).
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As soon as guest 2 is allowed to use transactional execution (indicated via
STFLE), he can also enable it for guest 3.
Active transactional execution requires also the second prefix page to be
mapped. If that page cannot be mapped, a validity icpt has to be presented
to the guest.
We have to take care of tx being toggled on/off, otherwise we might get
wrong prefix validity icpt.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As soon as message-security-assist extension 3 is enabled for guest 2,
we have to allow key wrapping for guest 3.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Issuing STFLE is extremely rare. Instead of copying 2k on every
VSIE call, let's do this lazily, when a guest 3 tries to execute
STFLE. We can setup the block and retry.
Unfortunately, we can't directly forward that facility list, as
we only have a 31 bit address for the facility list designation.
So let's use a DMA allocation for our vsie_page instead for now.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
If guest 2 is allowed to use edat 1 / edat 2, it can also set it up for
guest 3, so let's properly check and forward the edat cpuflags.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As soon as we forward an ibc to guest 2 (indicated via
kvm->arch.model.ibc), he can also use it for guest 3. Let's properly round
the ibc up/down, so we avoid any potential validity icpts from the
underlying SIE, if it doesn't simply round the values.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
In order to not always map the prefix, we have to take care of certain
aspects that implicitly unmap the prefix:
- Changes to the prefix address
- Changes to MSO, because the HVA of the prefix is changed
- Changes of the gmap shadow (e.g. unshadowed, asce or edat changes)
By properly handling these cases, we can stop remapping the prefix when
there is no reason to do so.
This also allows us now to not acquire any gmap shadow locks when
rerunning the vsie and still having a valid gmap shadow.
Please note, to detect changing gmap shadows, we have to keep the reference
of the gmap shadow. The address of a gmap shadow does otherwise not
reliably indicate if the gmap shadow has changed (the memory chunk
could get reused).
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
This patch adds basic support for nested virtualization on s390x, called
VSIE (virtual SIE) and allows it to be used by the guest if the necessary
facilities are supported by the hardware and enabled for the guest.
In order to make this work, we have to shadow the sie control block
provided by guest 2. In order to gain some performance, we have to
reuse the same shadow blocks as good as possible. For now, we allow
as many shadow blocks as we have VCPUs (that way, every VCPU can run the
VSIE concurrently).
We have to watch out for the prefix getting unmapped out of our shadow
gmap and properly get the VCPU out of VSIE in that case, to fault the
prefix pages back in. We use the PROG_REQUEST bit for that purpose.
This patch is based on an initial prototype by Tobias Elpelt.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Nested virtualization will have to enable own gmaps. Current code
would enable the wrong gmap whenever scheduled out and back in,
therefore resulting in the wrong gmap being enabled.
This patch reenables the last enabled gmap, therefore avoiding having to
touch vcpu->arch.gmap when enabling a different gmap.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
The default kvm gmap notifier doesn't have to handle shadow gmaps.
So let's just directly exit in case we get notified about one.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's not fault in everything in read-write but limit it to read-only
where possible.
When restricting access rights, we already have the required protection
level in our hands. When reading from guest 2 storage (gmap_read_table),
it is obviously PROT_READ. When shadowing a pte, the required protection
level is given via the guest 2 provided pte.
Based on an initial patch by Martin Schwidefsky.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
It will be very helpful to have a mechanism to check without any locks
if a given gmap shadow is still valid and matches the given properties.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
For nested virtualization, we want to know if we are handling a protection
exception, because these can directly be forwarded to the guest without
additional checks.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We have no known user of real-space designation and only support it to
be architecture compliant.
Gmap shadows with real-space designation are never unshadowed
automatically, as there is nothing to protect for the top level table.
So let's simply limit the number of such shadows to one by removing
existing ones on creation of another one.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We can easily support real-space designation just like EDAT1 and EDAT2.
So guest2 can provide for guest3 an asce with the real-space control being
set.
We simply have to allocate the biggest page table possible and fake all
levels.
There is no protection to consider. If we exceed guest memory, vsie code
will inject an addressing exception (via program intercept). In the future,
we could limit the fake table level to the gmap page table.
As the top level page table can never go away, such gmap shadows will never
get unshadowed, we'll have to come up with another way to limit the number
of kept gmap shadows.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Just like we already do with ste protection, let's take rte protection
into account. This way, the host pte doesn't have to be mapped writable.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
If the guest is enabled for EDAT2, we can easily create shadows for
guest2 -> guest3 provided tables that make use of EDAT2.
If guest2 references a 2GB page, this memory looks consecutive for guest2,
but it does not have to be so for us. Therefore we have to create fake
segment and page tables.
This works just like EDAT1 support, so page tables are removed when the
parent table (r3t table entry) is changed.
We don't hve to care about:
- ACCF-Validity Control in RTTE
- Access-Control Bits in RTTE
- Fetch-Protection Bit in RTTE
- Common-Region Bit in RTTE
Just like for EDAT1, all bits might be dropped and there is no guaranteed
that they are active.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
If the guest is enabled for EDAT1, we can easily create shadows for
guest2 -> guest3 provided tables that make use of EDAT1.
If guest2 references a 1MB page, this memory looks consecutive for guest2,
but it might not be so for us. Therefore we have to create fake page tables.
We can easily add that to our existing infrastructure. The invalidation
mechanism will make sure that fake page tables are removed when the parent
table (sgt table entry) is changed.
As EDAT1 also introduced protection on all page table levels, we have to
also shadow these correctly.
We don't have to care about:
- ACCF-Validity Control in STE
- Access-Control Bits in STE
- Fetch-Protection Bit in STE
- Common-Segment Bit in STE
As all bits might be dropped and there is no guaranteed that they are
active ("unpredictable whether the CPU uses these bits", "may be used").
Without using EDAT1 in the shadow ourselfes (STE-format control == 0),
simply shadowing these bits would not be enough. They would be ignored.
Please note that we are using the "fake" flag to make this look consistent
with further changes (EDAT2, real-space designation support) and don't let
the shadow functions handle fc=1 stes.
In the future, with huge pages in the host, gmap_shadow_pgt() could simply
try to map a huge host page if "fake" is set to one and indicate via return
value that no lower fake tables / shadow ptes are required.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
In preparation for EDAT1/EDAT2 support for gmap shadows, we have to store
the requested edat level in the gmap shadow.
The edat level used during shadow translation is a property of the gmap
shadow. Depending on that level, the gmap shadow will look differently for
the same guest tables. We have to store it internally in order to support
it later.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
If a guest ste is read-only, it doesn't make sense to force the ptes in as
writable in the host. If the source page is read-only in the host, it won't
have to be made writable. Please note that if the source page is not
available, it will still be faulted in writable. This can be changed
internally later on.
If ste protection is removed, underlying shadow tables are also removed,
therefore this change does not affect the guest.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's take the ipte_lock while working on guest 2 provided page table, just
like the other gaccess functions.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As gmap shadows contains correct protection permissions, protection
exceptons can directly be forwarded to guest 3. If we would encounter
a protection exception while faulting, the next guest 3 run will
automatically handle that for us.
Keep the dat_protection logic in place, as it will be helpful later.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Instead of doing it in the caller, let's just take the mmap_sem
in kvm_s390_shadow_fault(). By taking it as read, we allow parallel
faulting on shadow page tables, gmap shadow code is prepared for that.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Before any thread is allowed to use a gmap_shadow, it has to be fully
initialized. However, for invalidation to work properly, we have to
register the new gmap_shadow before we protect the parent gmap table.
Because locking is tricky, and we have to avoid duplicate gmaps, let's
introduce an initialized field, that signalizes other threads if that
gmap_shadow can already be used or if they have to retry.
Let's properly return errors using ERR_PTR() instead of simply returning
NULL, so a caller can properly react on the error.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We have to unlock sg->guest_table_lock in order to call
gmap_protect_rmap(). If we sleep just before that call, another VCPU
might pick up that shadowed page table (while it is not protected yet)
and use it.
In order to avoid these races, we have to introduce a third state -
"origin set but still invalid" for an entry. This way, we can avoid
another thread already using the entry before the table is fully protected.
As soon as everything is set up, we can clear the invalid bit - if we
had no race with the unshadowing code.
Suggested-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We really want to avoid manually handling protection for nested
virtualization. By shadowing pages with the protection the guest asked us
for, the SIE can handle most protection-related actions for us (e.g.
special handling for MVPG) and we can directly forward protection
exceptions to the guest.
PTEs will now always be shadowed with the correct _PAGE_PROTECT flag.
Unshadowing will take care of any guest changes to the parent PTE and
any host changes to the host PTE. If the host PTE doesn't have the
fitting access rights or is not available, we have to fix it up.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
For now, the tlb of shadow gmap is only flushed when the parent is removed,
not when it is removed upfront. Therefore other shadow gmaps can reuse the
tables without the tlb getting flushed.
Fix this by simply flushing the tlb
1. Before the shadow tables are removed (analogouos to other unshadow functions)
2. When the gmap is freed and therefore the top level pages are freed.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Without the storage-key facility, SIE won't interpret SSKE, ISKE and
RRBE for us. So let's add proper interception handlers that will be called
if lazy sske cannot be enabled.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's trace and count all skey handling operations, even if lazy skey
handling was already activated. Also, don't enable lazy skey handling if
anything went wrong while enabling skey handling for the SIE.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
In theory, end could always end up being < start, if overflowing to 0.
Although very unlikely for now, let's just fix it.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We already indicate that facility but don't implement it in our pfmf
interception handler. Let's add a new storage key handling function for
conditionally setting the guest storage key.
As we will reuse this function later on, let's directly implement returning
the old key via parameter and indicating if any change happened via rc.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Depending on the addressing mode, we must not overwrite bit 0-31 of the
register. In addition, 24 bit and 31 bit have to set certain bits to 0,
which is guaranteed by converting the end address to an effective
address.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
The current calculation is wrong if absolute != real address. Let's just
calculate the start address for 4k frames upfront. Otherwise, the
calculated end address will be wrong, resulting in wrong memory
location/storage keys getting touched.
To keep low-address protection working (using the effective address),
we have to move the check.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
No need to convert the storage key into an unsigned long, the target
function expects a char as argument.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's just split returning the key and reporting errors. This makes calling
code easier and avoids bugs as happened already.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We can safe a few LOC and make that function easier to understand
by rewriting existing code.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Commit 1e133ab296 ("s390/mm: split arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c") changed
the return value of get_guest_storage_key to an unsigned char, resulting
in -EFAULT getting interpreted as a valid storage key.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.6+
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Constrained transactional execution is an addon of transactional execution.
Let's enable the assist also if only TX is enabled for the guest.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
host-protection-interruption control was introduced with ESOP. So let's
enable it only if we have ESOP and add an explanatory comment why
we can live without it.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's enable interlock-and-broadcast suppression only if the facility is
actually available.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's enable interpretation of PFMFI only if the facility is
actually available. Emulation code still works in case the guest is
offered EDAT-1.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's only enable conditional-external-interruption if the facility is
actually available.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
If guest-storage-limit-suppression is not available, we would for now
have a valid guest address space with size 0. So let's simply set the
origin to 0 and the limit to hamax.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's not provide the device attribute for cmma enabling and clearing
if the hardware doesn't support it.
This also helps getting rid of the undocumented return value "-EINVAL"
in case CMMA is not available when trying to enable it.
Also properly document the meaning of -EINVAL for CMMA clearing.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Now that we can detect if collaborative-memory-management interpretation
is available, replace the heuristic by a real hardware detection.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's detect the Collaborative-memory-management-interpretation facility,
aka CMM assist, so we can correctly enable cmma later.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Without guest-PER enhancement, we can't provide any debugging support.
Therefore act like kernel support is missing.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Without that facility, we may only use scaol. So fallback
to DMA allocation in that case, so we won't overwrite random memory
via the SIE.
Also disallow ESCA, so we don't have to handle that allocation case.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
We have certain instructions that indicate available subfunctions via
a query subfunction (crypto functions and ptff), or via a test bit
function (plo).
By exposing these "subfunction blocks" to user space, we allow user space
to
1) query available subfunctions and make sure subfunctions won't get lost
during migration - e.g. properly indicate them via a CPU model
2) change the subfunctions to be reported to the guest (even adding
unavailable ones)
This mechanism works just like the way we indicate the stfl(e) list to
user space.
This way, user space could even emulate some subfunctions in QEMU in the
future. If this is ever applicable, we have to make sure later on, that
unsupported subfunctions result in an intercept to QEMU.
Please note that support to indicate them to the guest is still missing
and requires hardware support. Usually, the IBC takes already care of these
subfunctions for migration safety. QEMU should make sure to always set
these bits properly according to the machine generation to be emulated.
Available subfunctions are only valid in combination with STFLE bits
retrieved via KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE and enabled via
KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR. If the applicable bits are available, the
indicated subfunctions are guaranteed to be correct.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
KVM will have to query these functions, let's add at least the query
capabilities.
PCKMO has RRE format, as bit 16-31 are ignored, we can still use the
existing function. As PCKMO won't touch the cc, let's force it to 0
upfront.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions. As we will
need the correct ar, let's pass that to guest_page_range().
This will also make sure that the guest address is stored in the tec
for applicable excptions.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Let's use our new function for preparing translation exceptions.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>