iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Switch to sparse friendly claim/release_direct()
This driver caused a false positive with __cond_lock() style solution but is fine with the simple boolean return approach now used. Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250331121317.1694135-20-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1804,12 +1804,11 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
|
||||
|
||||
switch (mask) {
|
||||
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
|
||||
ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(iio_dev);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (!iio_device_claim_direct(iio_dev))
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = st_lsm6dsx_read_oneshot(sensor, ch->address, val);
|
||||
iio_device_release_direct_mode(iio_dev);
|
||||
iio_device_release_direct(iio_dev);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
|
||||
*val = sensor->odr / 1000;
|
||||
@@ -1834,11 +1833,10 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
|
||||
int val, int val2, long mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
err = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(iio_dev);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
if (!iio_device_claim_direct(iio_dev))
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (mask) {
|
||||
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
|
||||
@@ -1860,7 +1858,7 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
iio_device_release_direct_mode(iio_dev);
|
||||
iio_device_release_direct(iio_dev);
|
||||
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user