I have put Michael as maintainer on this one. Happy to change it to
someone else though.
One issue in here, is I cannot have an example with a negative
limit on the range. There are very few such yaml bindings in existence
but the thermal-zones.yaml has the same problem. If there is
any means of fixing this let me know. For now I'm sticking to
positive range values in the example.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031134110.724233-24-jic23@kernel.org
During stream start DSP firmware requires LPCS disabled as that moment in
time is resource heavy. Currently high-clock is selected on start of
second stream onwards while low-clock is re-selected before stream
actually leaves RESUME state i.e. PAUSE_STREAM call. Fix this by always
updating clock before RESUME_STREAM and directly after PAUSE_STREAM.
Fixes: a126750fc8 ("ASoC: Intel: catpt: PCM operations")
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201116133332.8530-3-cezary.rojewski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Playing with very low period sizes may lead to timeouts when awaiting
RESET_STREAM reply for offload streams. This is caused by NOTIFY_POSITION
appearing in the middle of trigger(stop).
Stream is unprepared during trigger(stop) where PAUSE_STREAM IPC gets
invoked. However, all data that is already mixed in DSP firmware's mixer
stream will still be played regardless of the pause. For offload streams,
this means possibility for another NOTIFY_POSITION to process. Keep these
notifications in check by only handling them when stream is in prepared
state.
Fixes: a126750fc8 ("ASoC: Intel: catpt: PCM operations")
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201116133332.8530-2-cezary.rojewski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Converted to maintain the requirement for Vdd-supply as per original file.
It is possible we could relax this requirement to make it at least one
of Vdd-supply and REF-supply. We need to establish the scaling of the
output channel and if REF-supply is provided that is used instead of
Vdd-supply, hence I cannot see why a dummy regulator cannot be used for
Vdd-supply if this happens.
For now, let us keep it simple.
Drop adi,use-external-reference from binding example as no such binding
exists.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031134110.724233-18-jic23@kernel.org
This one is a bit interesting because the binding was moved from
misc a while back, but the linux support for this device is
provided via the ad5446 DAC driver which doesn't currently
have a binding.
For now, lets just convert this file over, but we may want to
think about consolidating this with proper documentation of
the bindings for the other parts supported by the ad5446 driver.
As Daniel Mack does not seem to have been active since 2015,
I've put myself as maintainer of this binding for now.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031134110.724233-15-jic23@kernel.org
A few tweaks in this conversion.
* The example didn't have the I2C address of 4C in the node name so
fixed that.
* The reference voltage in the txt file is an optional binding, but
the driver is making use of it to provide the scaling of the output
channels. As such I have made it required going forwards.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031134110.724233-13-jic23@kernel.org
Simple conversion. There hasn't been much activity around this driver
for a long time and I don't think I have any up to date contact details
for the original authors. As such, I've listed myself as the binding
maintainer. More than happy to hand it off to someone more relevant though!
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031134110.724233-10-jic23@kernel.org
The conversion is straight forward, but leaves an open question.
The compatible for this device has never had a vendor.
Harald Geyer has identified as probably being made by aosong,
but we have no current match to any of their more specific part
numbers. As such, this is noted in the file but the
compatible doesn't include the vendor prefix.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-By: Harald Geyer <harald@ccbib.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201031134110.724233-5-jic23@kernel.org
From commit 6915564dc5 ("ACPI: OSL: Change the type of
acpi_os_map_generic_address() return value"),
acpi_os_map_generic_address() will return logical address or NULL
for error, but for ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO case, it should be also
return 0 as it's a normal case, but now it will return -ENXIO.
So check it out for such case to avoid einj module initialization
fail.
Fixes: 6915564dc5 ("ACPI: OSL: Change the type of acpi_os_map_generic_address() return value")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Martin Schiller is an active developer and reviewer for the X.25 code.
His company is providing products based on the Linux X.25 stack.
So he is a good candidate for maintainers of the X.25 code.
The original maintainer of the X.25 network layer (Andrew Hendry) has
not sent any email to the netdev mail list since 2013. So he is probably
inactive now.
Cc: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201114111029.326972-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Packets are processed even though the first fragment don't include all
headers through the upper layer header. This breaks TAHI IPv6 Core
Conformance Test v6LC.1.3.6.
Referring to RFC8200 SECTION 4.5: "If the first fragment does not include
all headers through an Upper-Layer header, then that fragment should be
discarded and an ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 3, message should be sent to
the source of the fragment, with the Pointer field set to zero."
The fragment needs to be validated the same way it is done in
commit 2efdaaaf88 ("IPv6: reply ICMP error if the first fragment don't
include all headers") for ipv6. Wrap the validation into a common function,
ipv6_frag_thdr_truncated() to check for truncation in the upper layer
header. This validation does not fullfill all aspects of RFC 8200,
section 4.5, but is at the moment sufficient to pass mentioned TAHI test.
In netfilter, utilize the fragment offset returned by find_prev_fhdr() to
let ipv6_frag_thdr_truncated() start it's traverse from the fragment
header.
Return 0 to drop the fragment in the netfilter. This is the same behaviour
as used on other protocol errors in this function, e.g. when
nf_ct_frag6_queue() returns -EPROTO. The Fragment will later be picked up
by ipv6_frag_rcv() in reassembly.c. ipv6_frag_rcv() will then send an
appropriate ICMP Parameter Problem message back to the source.
References commit 2efdaaaf88 ("IPv6: reply ICMP error if the first
fragment don't include all headers")
Signed-off-by: Georg Kohmann <geokohma@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201111115025.28879-1-geokohma@cisco.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Zhang Qilong says:
====================
Fix usage counter leak by adding a general sync ops
In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync,
but it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers
forget to decrease the usage counter when it failed, which could
resulted in reference leak. It has been discussed a lot[0][1]. So we
add a function to deal with the usage counter for better coding and
view. Then, we replace pm_runtime_resume_and_get with it in fec_main.c
to avoid it.
[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/14/88
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=178139
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201110092933.3342784-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pm_runtime_get_sync() will increment pm usage at first and it will
resume the device later. If runtime of the device has error or
device is in inaccessible state(or other error state), resume
operation will fail. If we do not call put operation to decrease
the reference, it will result in reference count leak. Moreover,
this device cannot enter the idle state and always stay busy or other
non-idle state later. So we fixed it by replacing it with
pm_runtime_resume_and_get.
Fixes: 8fff755e9f ("net: fec: Ensure clocks are enabled while using mdio bus")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Commit 7f832645d0 ("dmaengine: ioatdma: remove ioatdma v2 registration")
missed to remove dca2_tag_map_valid() during its removal. Hence, since
then, dca2_tag_map_valid() is unused and make CC=clang W=1 warns:
drivers/dma/ioat/dca.c:44:19:
warning: unused function 'dca2_tag_map_valid' [-Wunused-function]
So, remove this unused function and get rid of a -Wused-function warning.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113081248.26416-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
This fix is for a failure that occurred in the DWARF unwind perf test.
Stack unwinders may probe memory when looking for frames.
Memory sanitizer will poison and track uninitialized memory on the
stack, and on the heap if the value is copied to the heap.
This can lead to false memory sanitizer failures for the use of an
uninitialized value.
Avoid this problem by removing the poison on the copied stack.
The full msan failure with track origins looks like:
==2168==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x559ceb10755b in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8
#1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceb106acf in __libdwfl_frame_reg_set elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:77:22
#1 0x559ceb106acf in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:627:13
#2 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#3 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#9 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#10 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#11 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#12 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#13 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#14 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#15 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#16 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#18 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#20 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#21 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#22 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#23 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#24 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceb106a54 in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:613:9
#1 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#2 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#3 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#4 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#8 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#9 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#10 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#11 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#12 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#13 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#14 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#15 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#16 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#17 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#18 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#19 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#20 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#21 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#22 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#23 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559ceaff8800 in memory_read tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:156:10
#1 0x559ceb10f053 in expr_eval elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:501:13
#2 0x559ceb1060cc in handle_cfi elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:603:18
#3 0x559ceb105448 in __libdwfl_frame_unwind elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:741:4
#4 0x559ceb0ece90 in dwfl_thread_getframes elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:435:7
#5 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_frames_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:379:10
#6 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in get_one_thread_cb elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:308:17
#7 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthreads elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:283:17
#8 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in getthread elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:354:14
#9 0x559ceb0ec6b7 in dwfl_getthread_frames elfutils/libdwfl/dwfl_frame.c:388:10
#10 0x559ceaff6ae6 in unwind__get_entries tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c:236:8
#11 0x559ceabc9dbc in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:111:8
#12 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#13 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#14 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#15 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#16 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#17 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#18 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#19 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#20 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#21 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#22 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#23 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#24 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#25 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was stored to memory at
#0 0x559cea9027d9 in __msan_memcpy llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1558:3
#1 0x559cea9d2185 in sample_ustack tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:41:2
#2 0x559cea9d202c in test__arch_unwind_sample tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:72:9
#3 0x559ceabc9cbd in test_dwarf_unwind__thread tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:106:6
#4 0x559ceabca5cf in test_dwarf_unwind__compare tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:138:26
#5 0x7f812a6865b0 in bsearch (libc.so.6+0x4e5b0)
#6 0x559ceabca871 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_3 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:162:2
#7 0x559ceabca926 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_2 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:169:9
#8 0x559ceabca946 in test_dwarf_unwind__krava_1 tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:174:9
#9 0x559ceabcae12 in test__dwarf_unwind tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c:211:8
#10 0x559ceabbc4ab in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:418:9
#11 0x559ceabbc4ab in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:448:9
#12 0x559ceabbac70 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:669:4
#13 0x559ceabbac70 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:815:9
#14 0x559cea960e30 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
#15 0x559cea95fbce in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
#16 0x559cea95fbce in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
#17 0x559cea95fbce in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3
Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'bf' in the stack frame of function 'perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events'
#0 0x559ceafc5f60 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c:445
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value elfutils/libdwfl/frame_unwind.c:648:8 in handle_cfi
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sandeep Dasgupta <sdasgup@google.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201113182053.754625-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Jonathan Cameron