The DSI host might be left in some state by the bootloader. If this
state generates an IRQ, it might hang the system by holding the
interrupt line before the driver sets up the DSI host to the known
state.
Move the request_irq into msm_dsi_host_init and pass IRQF_NO_AUTOEN to
it. Call enable/disable_irq after msm_dsi_host_power_on/_off()
functions, so that we can be sure that the interrupt is delivered when
the host is in the known state.
It is not possible to defer the interrupt enablement to a later point,
because drm_panel_prepare might need to communicate with the panel over
the DSI link and that requires working interrupt.
Fixes: a689554ba6 ("drm/msm: Initial add DSI connector support")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211002010830.647416-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
If an object in the excl or shared slot is a composite fence from a
parallel submit and the current request in the conflict tracking is from
the same parallel context there is no need to enforce ordering as the
ordering is already implicit. Make the request conflict tracking
understand this by comparing a parallel submit's parent context and
skipping conflict insertion if the values match.
v2:
(John Harrison)
- Reword commit message
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-23-matthew.brost@intel.com
If an error occurs in the front end when multi-lrc requests are getting
generated we need to skip these in the backend but we still need to
emit the breadcrumbs seqno. An issues arises because with multi-lrc
breadcrumbs there is a handshake between the parent and children to make
forward progress. If all the requests are not present this handshake
doesn't work. To work around this, if multi-lrc request has an error we
skip the handshake but still emit the breadcrumbs seqno.
v2:
(John Harrison)
- Add comment explaining the skipping of the handshake logic
- Fix typos in the commit message
v3:
(John Harrison)
- Fix up some comments about the math to NOP the ring
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-22-matthew.brost@intel.com
Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL
after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension.
The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration.
This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find
all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all
the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests,
a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to
commit the requests to the backend.
A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return
to the user and to stick in dma resv slots.
No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when
throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation,
i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done
because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we
believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this
proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the
wait.
IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1
media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252
v2:
(Matthew Brost)
- Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails
v3:
(John Harrison)
- Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking
- Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior
- Line wrap some comments
- eb_add_request returns void
- Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used
(Checkpatch)
- Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch]
v4:
(CI)
- Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args
- Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit
(Kernel test robot)
- Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline
v5:
(John Harrison)
- Fix typo in comments near bb order loops
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
For some users of multi-lrc, e.g. split frame, it isn't safe to preempt
mid BB. To safely enable preemption at the BB boundary, a handshake
between parent and child is needed, syncing the set of BBs at the
beginning and end of each batch. This is implemented via custom
emit_bb_start & emit_fini_breadcrumb functions and enabled by default if
a context is configured by set parallel extension.
Lastly, this patch updates the process descriptor to the correct size as
the memory used in the handshake is directly after the process
descriptor.
v2:
(John Harrison)
- Fix a few comments wording
- Add struture for parent page layout
v3:
(John Harrison)
- A structure for sync semaphore
- Use offsetof to calc address
- Update commit message
v4:
(John Harrison)
- Fix typos in comment explaining memory map of scratch page
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-20-matthew.brost@intel.com
Update context and full GPU reset to work with multi-lrc. The idea is
parent context tracks all the active requests inflight for itself and
its children. The parent context owns the reset replaying / canceling
requests as needed.
v2:
(John Harrison)
- Simply loop in find active request
- Add comments to find ative request / reset loop
v3:
(John Harrison)
- s/its'/its/g
- Fix comment when searching for active request
- Reorder if state in __guc_reset_context
v4:
(Kernel test robot)
- Delete unused is_multi_lrc function
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-15-matthew.brost@intel.com
Implement multi-lrc submission via a single workqueue entry and single
H2G. The workqueue entry contains an updated tail value for each
request, of all the contexts in the multi-lrc submission, and updates
these values simultaneously. As such, the tasklet and bypass path have
been updated to coalesce requests into a single submission.
v2:
(John Harrison)
- s/wqe/wqi
- Use FIELD_PREP macros
- Add GEM_BUG_ONs ensures length fits within field
- Add comment / white space to intel_guc_write_barrier
(Kernel test robot)
- Make need_tasklet a static function
v3:
(Docs)
- A comment for submission_stall_reason
v4:
(Kernel test robot)
- Initialize return value in bypass tasklt submit function
(John Harrison)
- Add comment near work queue defs
- Add BUILD_BUG_ON to ensure WQ_SIZE is a power of 2
- Update write_barrier comment to talk about work queue
v5:
(John Harrison)
- Fix typo in work queue comment
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-13-matthew.brost@intel.com
Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids. This
is accomplished by partitioning guc_id space between ones that need to
be consecutive (1/16 available guc_ids) and ones that do not (15/16 of
available guc_ids). The consecutive search is implemented via the bitmap
API.
This is a precursor to the full GuC multi-lrc implementation but aligns
to how GuC mutli-lrc interface is defined - guc_ids must be consecutive
when using the GuC multi-lrc interface.
v2:
(Daniel Vetter)
- Explicitly state why we assign consecutive guc_ids
v3:
(John Harrison)
- Bring back in spin lock
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-11-matthew.brost@intel.com
Add multi-lrc context registration H2G. In addition a workqueue and
process descriptor are setup during multi-lrc context registration as
these data structures are needed for multi-lrc submission.
v2:
(John Harrison)
- Move GuC specific fields into sub-struct
- Clean up WQ defines
- Add comment explaining math to derive WQ / PD address
v3:
(John Harrison)
- Add PARENT_SCRATCH_SIZE define
- Update comment explaining multi-lrc register
v4:
(John Harrison)
- Move PARENT_SCRATCH_SIZE to common file
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-9-matthew.brost@intel.com
Introduce context parent-child relationship. Once this relationship is
created all pinning / unpinning operations are directed to the parent
context. The parent context is responsible for pinning all of its
children and itself.
This is a precursor to the full GuC multi-lrc implementation but aligns
to how GuC mutli-lrc interface is defined - a single H2G is used
register / deregister all of the contexts simultaneously.
Subsequent patches in the series will implement the pinning / unpinning
operations for parent / child contexts.
v2:
(Daniel Vetter)
- Add kernel doc, add wrapper to access parent to ensure safety
v3:
(John Harrison)
- Fix comment explaing GEM_BUG_ON in to_parent()
- Make variable names generic (non-GuC specific)
v4:
(John Harrison)
- s/its'/its/g
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-8-matthew.brost@intel.com
Dmitry Baryshkov