m68knommu: remove is_in_rom() function
Remove is_in_rom() function. It doesn't actually serve the purpose it was intended to. If you look at the use of it _access_ok() (which is the only use of it) then it is obvious that most of memory is marked as access_ok. No point having is_in_rom() then, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
a4c8b91590
commit
10146801e8
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static inline int pte_file(pte_t pte) { return 0; }
|
||||
* These would be in other places but having them here reduces the diffs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
|
||||
extern int is_in_rom(unsigned long);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No page table caches to initialise.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,12 +15,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#define access_ok(type,addr,size) _access_ok((unsigned long)(addr),(size))
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It is not enough to just have access_ok check for a real RAM address.
|
||||
* This would disallow the case of code/ro-data running XIP in flash/rom.
|
||||
* Ideally we would check the possible flash ranges too, but that is
|
||||
* currently not so easy.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int _access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
extern unsigned long memory_start, memory_end;
|
||||
|
||||
return (((addr >= memory_start) && (addr+size < memory_end)) ||
|
||||
(is_in_rom(addr) && is_in_rom(addr+size)));
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user