Merge branch 'perf/urgent' into perf/core

Merge reason: We want to apply a dependent patch.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

kernel/irq/proc.c

@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int irq_spurious_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 static int irq_spurious_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
-	return single_open(file, irq_spurious_proc_show, NULL);
+	return single_open(file, irq_spurious_proc_show, PDE(inode)->data);
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations irq_spurious_proc_fops = {

kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -3922,6 +3922,8 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
 		cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+		if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu)
+			goto next;
 		perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
 
 		ctx = task_event->task_ctx;
@@ -4066,6 +4068,8 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
 		cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+		if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu)
+			goto next;
 		perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
 
 		ctxn = pmu->task_ctx_nr;
@@ -4260,6 +4264,8 @@ got_name:
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
 		cpuctx = get_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+		if (cpuctx->active_pmu != pmu)
+			goto next;
 		perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event,
 					vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC);
 
@@ -4841,7 +4847,7 @@ static int perf_swevent_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (event_id > PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX)
+	if (event_id >= PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (!event->parent) {
@@ -5266,20 +5272,36 @@ static void *find_pmu_context(int ctxn)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void free_pmu_context(void * __percpu cpu_context)
+static void update_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct pmu *old_pmu)
 {
-	struct pmu *pmu;
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
+
+		cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu);
+
+		if (cpuctx->active_pmu == old_pmu)
+			cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu;
+	}
+}
+
+static void free_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+	struct pmu *i;
 
 	mutex_lock(&pmus_lock);
 	/*
 	 * Like a real lame refcount.
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
-		if (pmu->pmu_cpu_context == cpu_context)
+	list_for_each_entry(i, &pmus, entry) {
+		if (i->pmu_cpu_context == pmu->pmu_cpu_context) {
+			update_pmu_context(i, pmu);
 			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
-	free_percpu(cpu_context);
+	free_percpu(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
 }
@@ -5311,6 +5333,7 @@ int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu)
 		cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu;
 		cpuctx->jiffies_interval = 1;
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpuctx->rotation_list);
+		cpuctx->active_pmu = pmu;
 	}
 
 got_cpu_context:
@@ -5362,7 +5385,7 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu)
 	synchronize_rcu();
 
 	free_percpu(pmu->pmu_disable_count);
-	free_pmu_context(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+	free_pmu_context(pmu);
 }
 
 struct pmu *perf_init_event(struct perf_event *event)

kernel/printk.c

@@ -1082,13 +1082,15 @@ void printk_tick(void)
 
 int printk_needs_cpu(int cpu)
 {
+	if (unlikely(cpu_is_offline(cpu)))
+		printk_tick();
 	return per_cpu(printk_pending, cpu);
 }
 
 void wake_up_klogd(void)
 {
 	if (waitqueue_active(&log_wait))
-		__raw_get_cpu_var(printk_pending) = 1;
+		this_cpu_write(printk_pending, 1);
 }
 
 /**

kernel/trace/trace.c

@@ -2338,11 +2338,19 @@ tracing_write_stub(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	return count;
 }
 
+static loff_t tracing_seek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
+{
+	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ)
+		return seq_lseek(file, offset, origin);
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct file_operations tracing_fops = {
 	.open		= tracing_open,
 	.read		= seq_read,
 	.write		= tracing_write_stub,
-	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.llseek		= tracing_seek,
 	.release	= tracing_release,
 };