Use PL_sv_yes & PL_sv_no instead of newSViv(1) & newSViv(0) for bools
as they're interpreter globals that don't need to be created everytime.
Added a test and refactored the tests that were added with a1e30157,
all .t files in t/perl are now ran under all major perl versions with
and without threading when t/perl/run is invoked.
On my box, psgi_plugin.o went from 62,296 bytes to 62,208 bytes. Not a
huge saving I'll grant you, but every little helps :-)
Commit ff9bab4b fixed support for sending IO like handles or GLOBs
via sendfile by first calling fileno on them. This was checked
by calling Scalar::Util::reftype on the reference first, as per
https://metacpan.org/pod/PSGI#Body . This may be sane in pure
perl, but there are better methods in XS/C than string evalling
some Perl, which will eventually also call some XS/C.
This commit introduces more robust checking of whether we have a
"real" filehandle, and also introduces a test that chucks a bunch
of different scalars and references at uWSGI to make sure it doesn't
choke. I wasn't sure how to hook this test up to travis, or wether
that's even desireable, so just left the test in what I believe to
be the right directories.
Because this commit massively simplifies the code, it also had an
effect on object size, on my machine (x64, GCC 4.9), psgi_plugin.o
went from 63360 bytes to 62296 bytes.
The indentation level of the ->getline for loop has been left at
its original level, which is now incorrect, to make the diff
easier to read. A whitespace cleanup commit could follow.
In related news, does anyone know the purpose of the three other
use lines in psgi_loader.c, two of them were added back in 2011
by cf08972e, but I can't work out what their inclusion has to do
with memleak hunting.
Basically I would love to remove these lines as I don't believe
they're needed for uWSGI to function, and if apps running under
uWSGI need them, they should load them themselves.
Also related, would more PSGI refactorings be welcome? I get the
impression that Perl is a bit of a second class citizen in uWSGI
these days, and as both an avid user of uWSGI+PSGI and a hobby XS
developer, I'd love to clean up more of the PSGI plugin.
My previous commit ensured that we called the DESTROY hook but we
wouldn't properly call the atexit hook. Now when you start uWSGI as
instructed in that commit you'll get this:
* localhost:1234?0:
$$: Calling DESTROY
* localhost:1234?1:
*** psgix.harakiri.commit requested ***
...The work of process 523 is done. Seeya!
523: Calling the atexit hook
523: Calling DESTROY
* Ctrl+C (or stop):
^CSIGINT/SIGQUIT received...killing workers...
696: Calling the atexit hook
Before this change we wouldn't call the atexit hook when
psgix.harakiri.commit was requested by calling localhost:1234?1.
To make this work I removed the "if busy do not run atexit hooks"
condition added in 1.4-rc2-246-g499202e. Of course uWSGI is going to
think the worker is "busy", it's busy being destroyed, that doesn't mean
we should skip running the atexit hooks.
We'll still skip them under the "if hijacked do not run atexit hooks"
condition added in that commit, and the "managing atexit in async mode
is a real pain" condition added in 1.0.1-289-gd7e8523. Maybe those are
further bugs that need to be solved, but I don't know how to test those
modes.
Now we'll also call PERL_SET_CONTEXT() and PERL_SYS_TERM() appropriately
during destruction. Note that the latter should only be called once even
if you have multiple interpreters.
Before this we'd just exit(0) and let the OS clean up after us, but
e.g. with post-buffering=1 we'll end up with a temporary file in /tmp
that we won't clean up when we exit unless DESTROY is called.
This resulted in us leaking files in /tmp if we ever had a request where
the last request before a harakiri was a POST request with a body we'd
buffer to /tmp.
We'd have similar leaks in any user-defined code that required DESTROY
to run.
Aside from this I'm still not very comfortable with what this whole code
here in psgi_plugin.c and psgi_loader.c is doing when managing the
interpreter(s). It:
* Doesn't consistently call PERL_SET_CONTEXT() as described in "perldoc
perlembed".
* Nothing calls PERL_SYS_TERM() either.
* Should we be calling uwsgi_perl_free_stashes() here too?
To test this:
UWSGI_PROFILE=psgi python uwsgiconfig.py --build
./uwsgi --master --http-socket localhost:1234 --psgi t/perl/test_harakiri.psgi
Then elsewhere:
curl 'localhost:1234?0'
curl 'localhost:1234?1'
Both of those should emit "Calling DESTROY".
When we set pass_arguments=True, we should unpickle
'args' and 'kwargs' first.
Without it '_decode_from_spooler' will fail on 'decoding' their
packed by pickle data, because pickled data has 'bytes' type.
This is to test non-CPU bound servers that are waiting on
something (e.g. a database), expecting that we can have a lot more than
num CPU cores of these and not see performance degration.
This newly added support for read() offsets started causing "Use of
uninitialized value in subroutine entry" warnings.
This is all because there was a test for the number of items on the
stack, which ignored that the first argument is always the object, so 3
arguments to read() actually yields 4 arguments on the stack, not 3.
As a result we'd be calling SvIV() on a stack item that wasn't actually
passed in.
In 2.0.1-41-g3480c30 I introduced a regression with how the top-level
stackframe would appear within Perl programs. Before we'd show the
filename of the *.psgi file, but after we just showed "-e".
We can retain the bugfix I added in 2.0.1-41-g3480c30 while having a
sensible stacktrace by overriding the file via the #line directive.
The psgi loaded was calling perl_parse() with the script ostensibly to
set up xsinit.
However it would also call perl_parse() with the path to our *.psgi
file, whith the result that any BEGIN block in the *.psgi file would be
run twice, but anything outside BEGIN blocks would only run once.
This means that any code within explicit BEGIN blocks will run twice,
and any "use" statement in the *.psgi file will run its import() routine
twice, but due to the module being in %INC already we won't actually
compile things twice.
The previous behavior dates all the way back to the initial introduction
of the PSGI plugin in 299fd9c.
Then when support for local::lib was added in 7cbe751 we initially did a
perl_eval_pv() of a "use" statement like I'm doing here again now, but
later on in 1561dd3 changed it to call perl_parse with the commit
message "another PSGI loading fix".
Since there's no info on what that fixed or what was broken before I
have no idea if I'm introducing a regression here, but I don't see why
this way of loding local::lib shouldn't work, and it correctly munges
@INC for me when I try it.
We may still have this bug in the remaining perl_parse() calls that
remain for supporting "preinit" and "mule".
I haven't tested those modes (I don't use them), but when we load the
Perl apps we should only perl_parse() once with -e1, and then
perl_eval_pv() to actually load the application. We should not call
perl_parse() on code that we're just about to perl_eval_pv(), or we'll
run into this bug.
To test this just run:
./uwsgi --http 127.0.0.1:8080 --psgi ./t/perl/test.psgi
It'll no longer PANIC on the BEGIN block being run twice now, at least
in that simplistic non-"preinit" non-"mule" mode.
Unbit