CBB_add_asn1_uint64 doesn't work if you're encoding an implicitly-tagged
INTEGER. Take a leaf from Go cryptobyte and add a "with tag" variant,
rather than a "contents" variant, which is a little more convenient to
use. It also avoids us having to decide how to name the contents field.
Change-Id: I6072e55017230c513577c44c5a7ed86e778255b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/54685
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Benjamin
1ee71185a2