14 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
David Benjamin 33d1049b1f Switch the license to Apache 2.0, matching OpenSSL upstream
We use the standard Apache 2.0 file header, described in "APPENDIX: How
to apply the Apache License to your work."

This was primarily automated by running:

  git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD | xargs go run ./util/relicense.go

See go/boringssl-relicensing-triage for the results of triaging the
output of the tool.

As part of this, switch from taking fiat-crypto under MIT license to
Apache 2.0. (It is licensed under MIT OR Apache-2.0 OR BSD-1-Clause.)

The copyright_summary tool can also be used to confirm we didn't
accidentally drop any copyright lines:

  # Run before the CL
  git grep -l Copyright | xargs go run ./util/copyright_summary.go  -out /tmp/old.json
  # Run after the CL
  git grep -l Copyright | xargs go run ./util/copyright_summary.go  -compare /tmp/old.json

Bug: 364634028
Change-Id: I17c50e761e9d077a1f92e25969e50ed35e320c59
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/75852
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2025-02-03 15:05:16 -08:00
Adam Langley 59fc518963 Put structs in anonymous namespaces to avoid ODR worries.
The referenced bug notes some ODR warnings in an unspecified
configuration. (Which I can't get AppleClang or GCC 14 to reproduce, at
least.) This is likely due to us switching to C++. The ODR rules in C++
are a little different, but also perhaps the detection is only kicking
in for C++.

Either way, structs in .cc files are generally not intended to leave
that compilation unit. (Unless it's an opaque struct listed in base.h.)
There's no such thing as `static struct` so this change wraps many
structs in .cc files in `namespace {`. There are also lots of structs in
test file. Those are less concerning, but test files should mostly
entirely be in a namespace so this change does that where possible for
test files containing structs.

Bug: 384186552
Change-Id: I6ccf715fbcdc3ea6260b5d5d05f305182b1a9450
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/74407
Auto-Submit: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2024-12-16 16:47:03 -08:00
David Benjamin 6f4159567d Start maintaining an AUTHORS file
Following the guidance in
https://opensource.google/documentation/reference/releasing/authors,
start maintaining an AUTHORS file.

Update all existing Google copyright lines to 'The BoringSSL Authors'
per the document. This CL also changes the styling to match the new
guidance: removed the '(c)' and the comma.

All other existing copyright lines are left unmodified. Going forward,
our preference will be that new contributions to BoringSSL use 'The
BoringSSL Authors', optionally adding to the AUTHORS file if the
contributor desires.

To avoid being presumptuous, this CL does *not* proactively list every
past contributor in the BoringSSL half of the AUTHORS file. Past
contributors are welcome to send us a patch to be added, or request that
we add you. (Listed or not, the commit log continues to be a more
accurate record, and any existing non-Google copyright lines were left
unmodified.)

The OpenSSL half of the AUTHORS file is seeded with the contents of the
current OpenSSL AUTHORS file, as of writing. The current contents in the
latest revision of the 1.1.1 branch
(b372b1f76450acdfed1e2301a39810146e28b02c) and master
(d992e8729ee38b082482dc010e090bb20d1c7bd5) are identical, just formatted
in text vs Markdown.

Note when reviewing: CONTRIBUTING.md and AUTHORS contain non-mechanical
changes.

Bug: 364634028
Change-Id: I319d0ee63ec021ad85e248e8e3304b9cf9566681
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/74149
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2024-12-11 13:52:41 -08:00
David Benjamin 821fe3380c Document that null STACK_OF(T) can be used with several functions
Lots of code relies on this, so we ought to document it. A null
STACK_OF(T) is treated as an immutable empty list.

Change-Id: I10d0ba8f7b33c7f3febaf92c2cd3da25a0eb0f80
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/67407
Reviewed-by: Theo Buehler <theorbuehler@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
2024-03-22 04:06:12 +00:00
David Benjamin 1340a5b2dd Give up on qsort for sk_FOO_sort
OpenSSL's API constraints are such that sk_FOO_sort must take a
comparison function of type
int (*cmp)(const FOO *const *a, const FOO *const *b)

However qsort expects a comparison function of type
int (*cmp)(const void *a, const void *b)

In C, it is UB to cast a function pointer to a different type and call
it, even if the underlying calling conventions are the same. Moreover,
as qsort doesn't take a context parameter on its comparisons, we cannot
do the usual convention with closures in C.

qsort_r and qsort_s would avoid this, but they are unusable. Too many
libcs don't have them, and those that do define them inconsistently. See
https://stackoverflow.com/a/39561369

It seems this UB has finally hit a sanitizer in fxbug.dev/128274.
Irritating as it is to not even have a working sort function, I think
the easiest option is to just give up on qsort. As we did with bsearch
in https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/35304, just
implement an in-place heap sort ourselves.

Bug: fxbug.dev/128274
Change-Id: I9de6b4018bf635da0d0c5a680bd7811d297b0bb3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/60507
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
2023-06-07 17:39:26 +00:00
David Benjamin af0739fc73 Const-correct sk_FOO_cmp_func
This is a double-pointer and both layers should be const. This matches
OpenSSL 1.1.1, so in addition to being more const-correct, we're more
OpenSSL-compatible.

Update-Note: Anything that defines a comparison function would need to
fix the type signature. I found only one external caller, Envoy, that
defines it. https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/25051 fixes it.
(That we hadn't run into the upstream incompatibility suggests this is
just not a feature folks use outside the library much.)

Bumping BORINGSSL_API_VERSION, in case I missed any, and there's some
caller where we can't just use C++14 generic lambdas to smooth it over.

Fixed: 498
Change-Id: I8f07ff42215172aa65ad8819acf69b63d6d8e54c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56190
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2023-03-29 00:29:21 +00:00
David Benjamin f7d37fba96 Fix various malloc failure paths.
Caught by running malloc failure tests on unit tests.

Bug: 563
Change-Id: Ic0167ef346a282dc8b5a26a1cedafced7fef9ed0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56927
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
2023-02-06 21:33:21 +00:00
David Benjamin df8a55bf62 Const-correct sk_FOO_deep_copy's copy callback.
This aligns with upstream OpenSSL, so it's hopefully more compatible.
Code search says no one outside of the project uses this function, so
it's unlikely to break anyone.

Whether it makes things better is a bit of a wash: OBJ_dup and
OPENSSL_strdup loose a pointless wrapper. X509_NAME_dup gains one, but
hopefully that can be resolved once we solve the X509_NAME
const-correctness problem. CRYPTO_BUFFER_up_ref gains one... really
FOO_up_ref should have type const T * -> T *, but OpenSSL decided it
returns int, so we've got to cast.

Change-Id: Ifa6eaf26777ac7239db6021fc1eafcaed98e42c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56032
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2023-01-17 19:43:35 +00:00
David Benjamin ff23b7cb2c Empty stacks are vacuously sorted
In the X.509 policy rewrite, I'll be using sorted stacks to keep the
overall algorithm subquadratic. Fix up sk_FOO_is_sorted in these edge
cases so the asserts work more smoothly.

Change-Id: I369f53543f0c2219df6f62a81aead630a9dbcd8d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56031
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
2023-01-17 17:02:21 +00:00
David Benjamin 49e07914b3 Add sk_FOO_delete_if.
Change-Id: I9abfef8d3d4d3ce0dabe29a5dc391fd4e0200d7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56030
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
2023-01-17 16:13:34 +00:00
David Benjamin 00d72d342f Fix stack_test.cc in the prefixed build.
Uses of BORINGSSL_MAKE_DELETER must be inside BSSL_NAMESPACE_BEGIN for
the specializations to work.

Change-Id: Ib96cf5d235586b24c052973d7034c0e5a8019f17
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33346
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-11-27 21:35:56 +00:00
David Benjamin ce00828c89 Test the binary search more aggressively.
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/32115/ wasn't
worth it, but we may as well keep the test.  Also add a comment about
the asymptotics in case it ever comes up.

Change-Id: Ic4773106f1003adc56b4ce36520a18d3ac2d6f13
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/32284
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-10-02 00:02:19 +00:00
David Benjamin 8d2f4b993f Const-correct sk_find and sk_delete_ptr.
Change-Id: I7ddc2c4827602ddac2a4aec5f9ccfa21d6c0bc40
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/32112
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
2018-09-27 16:18:18 +00:00
David Benjamin 892a31b5fb Add a test for STACK_OF(T).
Amazingly, this module didn't have a unit test yet.

Change-Id: I021bb83cc747174196958db14c97154f0574c2e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/32111
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2018-09-26 23:28:50 +00:00